It's interesting how the title of the study already give some kind of conclusion ; I didn't know researcher already had a theory to verify even before starting the research ; In my opinion there is pro and cons ; pro is that it's more go forward and I guess with limited fund they need to go straight to the point but if the theory is untrue we go back to 0. For exemple if Waldinger is right(remember, our 2011 POIS hero) and POIS is auto immune, not sure we see something in the MRI.
This is the scientific method:
When you refer to "some kind of conclusion," I think you are confusing this with their hypothesis. There is no title of the study, I don't see why they would need one?? There will be a title to their paper, that they publish once they, test, experiment, analyze then communicate the results. And, they have the freedom to change their hypothesis during testing! If the hypothesis is not being backed up, they can definitely change approaches in this study!
I don't see how fMRI has much of any chance of gettting us 0 progress... this is one of the most knowledgeable researchers in the field. We might know a lot ourselves, but we havn't been able to fix each other. I think an outside, expert evaluation is needed, and that's exactly what we are getting.
Waldinger may be a hero is some respects, but who is to say this is autoimmune? It is still inconclusive. You are right in suspecting that Komisurak is looking to find out if there is pathology in our nervous system, but I am puzzled why there is so much worry that looking at fMRI will be a waste. The brain is the one best place to look to find out what is going on throughout the body. The brain responds and depends on feedback from the nerves.
There are many possibilities here, and I think the waste would be to rush. We are all wanting this fixed. Now. Right now. But the research that we have "bought" with all our money doesn't care about "right now." It is careful, methodical, and evidence based. We have very little evidence that any of our own pet theories work, but Dr Komisurak has LOTS of evidence to back up his hypothesis. Now, he should know we have a lot of knowledge ourselves, and should listen carefully to us. But we should listen carefully to him. And be patient! We already have a doctor doing research on the autoimmune side of things with Waldinger, and he has not delivered. Let him keep trying. But we have a world class neurologist now, and that gives us a new weapon against POIS.
The brain is the most complicated thing in the known universe, and now we have an expert who studies it. I think we should give him our attention! He may not find "the cure", but I have a STRONG suspicion he will find something important. And that is what we should expect. If each of us wants to find the cure our own way, we should raise our own money and find our own NORD, so we can do exactly what we want. But I'm glad it didn't happen this way! NORD spent most of a YEAR deciding who would best help us, looking at a variety of specialist and scientists. I think they have set us up for success.
It's too early to start criticizing... please, lets give the Dr. a chance, and PLEASE give him a warm welcome when he starts posting. Last thing I'd want to see is a bunch of critics critiquing his hypothesis before he even gets to talk to us directly... I hope I'm saying the obvious here!