To corroborate some of the discussion on digestion and Thyroid. I've been (along with Demo and some others) trying to live with this and self-helping with POIS "cures", for 40 years.
I can confirm in the early days of my POIS back in the 70's, Thyroid problem was a major component of the illness for me.
For the duration of my POIS, I have also had a digestion problem that when food hits my stomach, there is an automatic nervous tension response which forces me to chew the inside of my (mouth) gums. I have had this reaction since teen years.
I am NOT cured of POIS, but have made some very slow progress to feel a bit better each decade.
My most notable progress or leaps (from the 100's of things, therapies, ologies and diets I have tried) are:
- 10 years of taking a high grade St John's Wort.
- Removal of alcohol, most dairy foods and wheat/gluten.
- Taking herbal teas for years.
- In the last few months, the positive impact that Niacin has had on some occasions for me (although not all occasions). I am still trying Niacin flush.
I don't have a scientific mind, and struggle to understand and interpret all the myriad of new ideas being presented here and on NSF, but I am very impressed with all your knowledge and thinking guys, and agree here with what Nightingale is saying. I am sure Dr. K (with his knowledge of the brain and orgasm) has a good reason to point the research in the direction he proposes.
I will endeavour to contribute by travelling 6K miles at my cost to hopefully provide my own fMRI to the cause. I don't wish this on any 20 year old struggling with this.
Daveman has said the research team seem keen to "establish a good POIS profile". Also suggesting "they are very interested in knowing all of the details of POIS, symptoms, onset, progression, remedies, histories, everything". With this in mind, there must be some format (the research team could advise us on) in which we can contribute our knowledge and highlights of trends and symptoms, what's helped etc, but in a manner that they (the research team) can analyse and find trends, rather than in free hand contributions on the board, which can't then be analysed easily. (D & D), would this be an item for agenda on next Skype call you have with the team? Could we then be collating this data appropriately for later use, as we await Rutgers approval for fMRI's. Can we thus add some value to the research in this way, to help all get the most out of their ultimate hypotheses and outputs from the research.
It is possibly unhelpful to have unstructured feedback and information presented to researchers, who I think like structure and data that can be validated and that can potentially form part of this evidence based approach. Am possibly stating the obvious here or could we repeating what others suggested.