You were totally right Demo! Seems Dr. L is very sensitive to our forum! I find it fantastic!
As researchers, I completely understand that they need to take one thing a time and explore it in a systematic way. I totally agree on that. Suppose this is the normal procedure in any serious research work.
But I tought that we all already knew that POIS it is not due to an auto-allergy to semen. Are they study it just to confirm that It is not due to this? And try to prove It is rather due to autonomic-endocrine dysregulation?
Suppose it is something like this.... For sure there is a good reason they do it like this. I totally trust them... No need you pass this question again to them. We will see anyway. It is just to talk between us. Thank you so much to pass my previous question Demo!
Thanks, fernab! I took a chance sending, because we have not yet officially “started”, UNL admin has to approve our “sex” project, we are still a controversial subject in the world of research, so...expect some delays in getting authorization.
I am a bit troubled too about repeating what we know. I wouldn’t mind troubling the investigative team again if we can come up with enough...evidence...to dismiss the allergy theory.
fernab, could I ask you to help manage collecting the forum wisdom to that end? If you can summarize members ‘ “short & sweet” comments to *refute* allergy, I’ll discuss with Drs Lorenz & Prause! Take your time, we have at least 8 weeks or so before “starting”
Ok with you?