As I stated yesterday:
technical jargon can alienate readers
Alright! I won’t post about scientific matters in the future! It took away much of my time and I have more important things to do anyway. Hopefully our researchers are going to fully figure out POIS soon!
I can appreciat the effort you put into your posts, but this is a sulky attitude. In my everyday technical writing I also tend to overcomplicate things and go down endless rabbit holes of derivations. But most often brevity trumps endless elaborations, if you want to get a point across in scientific matters. As suggested earlier, in the future, you could restrict your posts to the key messages and put your intermediate reasonings into a text file attachment. This allows forum members to follow your arguments in-depth, if they wish.
Thank you, carlo_francesco.There have been research studies that confirm the impact of technical jargon in forums with non-technical audiences:
1. Zimmermann & Jucks (2018): This study found that experts using less technical jargon in forums aimed at laypersons were perceived as more credible and trustworthy. Conversely, excessive jargon reduced perceived accommodation and trustworthiness when addressing non-expert audiences.
2. Galinsky’s Research (2022): This study suggested that jargon is often used to signal authority or status but can alienate audiences unfamiliar with the terms, reducing effective communication.
3. Cybercrime Forum Study (2023): Research on a cybercrime forum revealed that excessive use of jargon (argot) negatively correlated with user reputation, suggesting that simpler language fosters better engagement and trust.
These studies highlight the importance of tailoring language to the audience for effective communication in forums.