Test results

[Starsky]

According to Hermans theory i give my test results here. If you have them too lets see the differences.



Sodium    141    mmol/l    136    145    N
Potassium    3,86    mmol/l    3,50    5,10    N
Magnesium    1,98    mg/dl    1,50    2,60    N
Iron    91,0    µg/dl    31,0    144,0    N
Ferritine    137,44    ng/ml    21,81    274,66    N
Ionized Calcium met. ISE    1,20    mmol/l    1,12-1,32    N

   
   
   
   
   
   
Ceruloplazmina    Ceruloplazmina    11,00    mg/dl    20,00    60,00    LOW!

   
   
   
   
   
   
TSH    TSH    1,0710    µIU/ml    0,3500    4,9400    N
T3    Trijodotyronina ca?kowita    1,00    ng/ml    0,58    1,59    N
T4    Tyroksyna ca?kowita    7,52    µg/dl    4,87    11,72    N





These are my results! I will reapeat the old results from 2009:

TSH 0,562 uIU/ml              (Normal: 0,270- 4,20)
FT4 1,57 ng/dl                    (0,932 - 1, 71)
FT3 2,91 pg/ml                   (2,0 - 4,4)

i was not tested for t3 and t4.



I have some test on Prolactin and Cortisol:


Cortisol 19.27 ( ref: 6,2 - 19,4)
Prolactin 3,12 ( ref: 4,04 - 15,2)

[victor.kons]

Here is my blood test results for comparison.

Sodium                       143            136 - 145
Potassium                         4.1            3.5 - 5.1
Magnesium                        0.84    0.73 - 1.08
Сhlorine                       101         98 - 107
Iron    28.4     12.5 - 32.2
Ferritine 115           20 - 250
Ionized Calcium 1.24       1.16 - 1.32

TSH                          1.18          0.4 - 4.0
Т3                            1.4           1.1 - 3.1
T3 free                  5.1             2.6 - 5.7
Т4 free                  15.9           9.0 - 22.0

[Daveman]

Can we indicate when the tests were taken. Before POIS day 1, 2, etc. Gives more perspective.

[Starsky]

Out of POIS

[Ccconfucius]

Here is my blood test results for comparison.

Sodium                       143            136 - 145
Potassium                         4.1            3.5 - 5.1
Magnesium                        0.84    0.73 - 1.08
?hlorine                       101         98 - 107
Iron    28.4     12.5 - 32.2
Ferritine 115           20 - 250
Ionized Calcium 1.24       1.16 - 1.32

TSH                          1.18          0.4 - 4.0
?3                            1.4           1.1 - 3.1
T3 free                  5.1             2.6 - 5.7
?4 free                  15.9           9.0 - 22.0

victor how long has herman being posting on russina forum. I do not trust him at all.

[Starsky]

Since 31 December

[victor.kons]

Can we indicate when the tests were taken. Before POIS day 1, 2, etc. Gives more perspective.

Out of POIS.

[victor.kons]

victor how long has herman being posting on russina forum. I do not trust him at all.

I think one should evaluate serious claims of persons posting to our forums. Herman has serious claims and they need to be evaluated.

So far I see many facts supporting his claims and I generally think he has good intentions, that's why I take his recommendations and ideas seriously, but I am unable to proof his claims to anyone yet, because I lack understanding in the
areas of gland functioning and mineral analysis.

I do not think that evaluating these claims contradicts in any way to NORD research. NORD research is very important. If Herman is incorrect - the research will be important. If Herman is totally correct and POIS is ultimatlely a mineral unbalance in all the POIS cases and the result of NORD research be the same, still research is very important, because it will establish a link, honourable by medical community, between POIS symptoms and mineral unbalance. This link then can be directly applicable in practice, e.g. you go to a doctor, tell him that you have the symptoms AND tell him, that according to NORD research your mineral balance need to be corrected and only after that your mind can be corrected if needed, NOT VICE VERSA!

Research is important in any case.

Victor

[LAPOISSE]

victor how long has herman being posting on russina forum. I do not trust him at all.

I think one should evaluate serious claims of persons posting to our forums. Herman has serious claims and they need to be evaluated.

So far I see many facts supporting his claims and I generally think he has good intentions, that's why I take his recommendations and ideas seriously, but I am unable to proof his claims to anyone yet, because I lack understanding in the
areas of gland functioning and mineral analysis.

I do not think that evaluating these claims contradicts in any way to NORD research. NORD research is very important. If Herman is incorrect - the research will be important. If Herman is totally correct and POIS is ultimatlely a mineral unbalance in all the POIS cases and the result of NORD research be the same, still research is very important, because it will establish a link, honourable by medical community, between POIS symptoms and mineral unbalance. This link then can be directly applicable in practice, e.g. you go to a doctor, tell him that you have the symptoms AND tell him, that according to NORD research your mineral balance need to be corrected and only after that your mind can be corrected if needed, NOT VICE VERSA!

Research is important in any case.

Victor

Hi Victor,

Can we know what is XN ?

thanks

"Currently using XN for 95% relief from POIS symptoms."

[victor.kons]

Hi Victor,

Can we know what is XN ?

thanks

"Currently using XN for 95% relief from POIS symptoms."

Hi LAPOISSE,

XN is abbreviation for Xanthinol Nicotinate. It's basically the form of Niacin, I like it more than pure Niacin, but its just the matter of "taste" I think

Victor