[reply from Daveman to above post from Egordon 6/24/2013:]
"EGordon,
Van was overreacting to something that wan't there.
Demo and I communicate daily, and I can assure you, there was nothing on any kind of agenda for "making fun" of the
desensitization program.
It is true however we had been discussing the desensitization program based on the post from
Prof. Dr Abdalla attia & Dr Hossam Yasien. (Which BTW supports information we have heard from other professionals in solid positions).
Several points I'd like to make:
1) We had great support from members of the forum, and were fortunate enough to raise funds to support the ONLY
program tha will get POIS out of the dark. It's unfortunate that you didn't take the time to do just a little bit of research on
the NORD program. YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN THAT THERE IS NO WAY TO INFLUENCE THE RESEARCH DIRECTION. We intentionally chose NORD
for that reason. There had been, and still is far too much conjecture and amateur medicine trying to lead POIS
GOD knows where.
2) We are administrators of this forum, and besides the 600+ members that use the forum there are many others who contact us and
share, including researchers and medical professionals. Among those have risen some very serious concerns. It puts us in a very delicate position.
We know that we can annoy some of you who feel they have been helped with desensistization, but the risks are too great NOT TO SAY SOMETHING.
In the end, our influence is weak, those who do not want to hear, won't listen. All we can hope is that soon NORD will get to the root of it
and either our fears will be wiped out, or we may have saved many who were preapared to listen.
3) EGordon. What if, just what if POIS was not an allergy to semen? There has been no definitive proof that it is. We don't know if non-POISers don't react to
the skin prick test. Why has this test NOT been done? Ethics? Is it ethical to inject semen into a POISer, without really even knowing if he has antibodies or is
actually allergic to his semen? What if he is not? He may have some kind of auto-immune problem, but NOT allergy. Introducing semen to his blood on a regular basis
could cause a problem that is not there. A potentially serious problem. There's so much more I could say, but unfortunatley I am not at liberty.
4) It's very likely that anyone who has done desensitization will not be eligible for testing, as a matter of fact, it may be difficult to use anyone
from any of these forums to do testing because of the wide spread publicity of desensitization. How does a researcher know that an individual has NOT
done desens on himself? He cannot trust the readings. Does he have anti-bodies becasue he did desens, or becasue of POIS. People will lie to prove their point,
or to try to move their theory ahead. Does that help the POIS cause? So it may be very difficult to continue any real and valid desensitization testing.
Your only hope of that is that they can do desensitization testing without knowing if someone has previously tried it or not. One would have to assume that the desens.
theory is correct (scientists donĀ“t like to assume) and follow some other double blind test procedure that is safe. It looks very difficult to me. You all really don't know what you are doing by trying to be docotrs yourselves.
Am I fear mongering? Complicated. I was a strong supporter initially of the "allergy theory", but I have heard too much to continue to support it.
I understand the problem. I could be stopping people from benefiting from desens., but I could be saving them as well. Based on the risks, I personally prefer the safe route.
There are plenty of forums on POIS who don't really care about our safety, and who are happy to be making you all happy with a new possibility ever other week.
It's the easy route. This hasn't been easy."
[Daveman]