Desenz has helped people with their symptoms so I don't see the reason why you wouldn't include it. You could add for example a notification that this method is barely accessible. There are also other reasons why he dropped this treatment, because it is time consuming and thus expensive.
Hi Muon,
As you may know, I am not supportive at all of the desensitization tretment with sub-cutanous injections of own semen. I will not go into all the details here, because this is not the purpose of this thread. But, after 10 years, and very few reports of real success with this method, which has many disadvantages to say the least, I think we have to go beyond it and give it the less exposure possible.
Why, in my opinion? Because, contrary to what you seem to express in your post, desensitization is totally associated to allergy treatment, in medical science (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allergen_immunotherapy ), and I think it is time that POIS gets out of this "allergy to semen" tag. POIS is so rarely talked about anywhere, that when it will be again, I surely hope this misleading tag will not be mentioned anymore. And there is so little information leaking to doctors and researchers about POIS, that it is totally unwanted to nurture the strict allergy theory, which will only report real development in POIS research.
You may have your reasons to try and convince me to include desens in my chart, but scientific rigor is not the one that could do it for me. For example, the POIS Chinese study has demonstrated that the Prick tests with own semen are non-specific, since a proportion of normal subjects in the study have tested positive in this prick test. From there, the "objective" basis of the desens protocol in POIS is already, in my opinion, been weakened, if not voided. But as mentioned, I won't go further in this discussion.
However, I am not totally closed to the opinion you have expressed, and have included a note at the end of the chart, about desensitization. That is as far as I will go.